Fast adaptive power control for a variable multirate communications system

ABSTRACT

A system and a method of controlling transmitter power in a wireless communication system in which user data is processed as a multirate signal having a rate N(t) and in which the user data signal having rate N(t) is converted into a transmission data signal having a faster rate M(t) for transmission. The transmission power is adjusted on a relatively slow basis based on quality of data received by a receiver of the transmitted data. The transmitter power is determined as a function of N(t)/M(t) such that a change in the data rate in the multiple channels or the rate of the transmission data signal is compensated in advance of a quality of data based adjustment associated with such data rate change. Preferably, the user data signal having rate N(t) is converted into the transmission data signal having the faster rate M(t) by repeating selected data bits whereby the energy per bit to noise spectrum density ratio is increased in the transmission data signal.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.09/904,001, filed Jul. 12, 2001 and U.S. patent application Ser. No.09/904,020, filed Jul. 12, 2001, which in turn claim priority from U.S.Provisional Patent Application No. 60/221,348, filed Jul. 26, 2000, andfrom U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/223,375, filed Aug. 7,2000, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to power control for wirelesscommunication systems and, in particular, fast adaptive power controlsystem and methods for a variable multirate communication system.

BACKGROUND

Various methods of power control for wireless communication systems arewell known in the art. An example of an open loop power controltransmitter system for a single rate data system is illustrated in FIG.1. An example of a closed loop power control transmitter system for asingle rate data is illustrated in FIG. 2.

The purpose of both systems is to rapidly vary transmitter power in thepresence of a fading propagation channel and time-varying interferenceto minimize transmitter power while insuring that data is received atthe remote end with acceptable quality. Typically, in a digitalimplementation, transmitter power is varied by applying a varying scalefactor to the digital data, as opposed, for example, to varying the gainof an RF amplifier.

In state-of-the-art communication systems such as Third GenerationPartnership Project (3GPP) Time Division Duplex (TDD) and FrequencyDivision Duplex (FDD) systems multiple channels of variable rate dataare combined for transmission. FIGS. 3 and 4 represent prior art openand closed power control transmission systems, respectively. Backgroundspecification data for such systems are found at 3GPP TS 25.223 v3.3.0,3GPP TS 25.222 v3.2.0, 3GPP TS 25.224 v3.6 and Volume 3 specificationsof Air-Interface for 3G Multiple System Version 1.0, Revision 1.0 by theAssociation of Radio Industries Businesses (ARIB).

Such open and closed loop power control systems for variable multiratewireless communications systems respond relatively slowly to data ratechanges, resulting in sub-optimal performance such as relating toexcessive transmitter power and below-quality received signals. It wouldbe desirable to provide a fast method and system of power controladaption for data rate changes resulting in more optimal performance.

SUMMARY

The invention provides a method of controlling transmitter power in awireless communication system in which user data is processed as amultirate signal having a rate N(t) and in which the user data signalhaving rate N(t) is converted into a transmission data signal having afaster rate M(t) for transmission. The transmission power is adjusted ona relatively slow basis based on quality of data received by a receiverof the transmitted data. The transmitter power is determined as afunction of N(t)/M(t) such that a change in the data rate in the userdata signal or the rate of the transmission data signal is compensatedfor in advance of a quality of data based adjustment associated withsuch data rate change. Preferably, the user data signal having rate N(t)is converted into the transmission data signal having the faster rateM(t) by repeating selected data bits whereby the energy per bit to noisespectrum density ratio is increased in the transmission data signal.

The method is applicable in either an open or closed power controlsystem where a scale factor is applied to control transmitter power. Inimplementing the invention in a transmitter of either an open or closedsystem, preferably √{square root over ( )}(N(t)/M(t)) is applied to thescale factor.

The method is applicable to an open loop power control system where thetransmitter receives a reference signal, reference signal power data,measured interference power data, and target signal to interferenceratio (SIR) data which SIR data is based on relatively slowly collectedreceived signal quality data. The transmitter measures the referencesignal to determine received reference signal power and computes a pathloss based on the received reference signal power data and thedetermined reference signal power. The transmitter then computes thescale factor based on the computed path loss, the received measuredinterference power data, the target SIR data and √{square root over ()}(N(t)/M(t)).

The method is also applicable to a closed loop system where thetransmitter utilizes step up/down data generated by the receiver andcomputes the scale factor based on the step up/step down data and√{square root over ( )}(N(t)/M(t)). Preferably, the step up/down data isgenerated by the receiver by combining measured interference power dataof the signal received from the transmitter with target signal tointerference ratio (SIR) data based at least in part on relativelyslowly collected received signal quality data. The target SIR data ispreferably computed by multiplying a nominal target SIR data based onrelatively slowly collected received signal quality data by a factorN(t)/M(t) so that the target SIR data is quickly adjusted when a changein data rate occurs.

The invention also provides a transmitter for a wireless communicationsystem in which user data is processed as a multirate signal having arate N(t) and in which the user data signal having rate N(t) isconverted into a transmission data signal having a faster rate M(t) fortransmission. The transmitter transmission power is adjusted on arelatively slow basis by applying a scale factor to the transmitterpower based on quality of data received by a receiver of the transmitteddata. The transmitter includes a data signal rate converter whichincreases the user data signal rate N(t) to a higher data transmissionrate M(t) and a processor for computing a transmission power scalefactor based in part on data generated by the receiver related toquality of data received. The data signal rate converter is associatedwith the processor such that the processor computes the transmissionpower scale factor as a function of N(t)/M(t) whereby a change in thedata rate in the user data signal or the rate of the transmission datasignal is compensated for in advance of a receiver quality of data basedadjustment associated with such data rate change.

Preferably, the data signal rate converter converts the user data signalhaving rate N(t) into the transmission data signal having the fasterrate M(t) by repeating selected data bits whereby the energy per bit tonoise spectrum density ratio is increased in the transmission datasignal.

The transmitter is configurable as part of an open loop power controlsystem where the transmitter receives from the receiver of thetransmitted data: a reference signal, reference signal power data,measured interference power data, and target signal to interferenceratio (SIR) data which SIR data is based on relatively slowly collectedreceived signal quality data. As such, the transmitter includes a signalmeasuring device which measures received reference signal power and pathloss processing circuitry for computing a path loss based on thereceived reference signal power data and the measured received referencesignal power. The transmitter processor computes the transmission powerscale factor based on the computed path loss, the received measuredinterference power data, the target SIR data and √{square root over ()}(N(t)/M(t)).

The transmitter is also configurable as part of a closed loop powercontrol system where the transmitter receives step up/down data from thereceiver of the transmitted data. As such, the transmitter processorcomputes the transmission power scale factor based on the received stepup/step down data and √{square root over ( )}(N(t)/M(t)).

The invention also provides a closed loop transmission power controlsystem for a wireless communication system in which user data isprocessed as a multirate signal having a rate N(t), in which the userdata signal having rate N(t) is converted into a transmission datasignal having a faster rate M(t) for transmission and in which thetransmission power is adjusted by applying a scale factor in response tostep up/down data. The system includes a receiver which receives theM(t) rate transmission data signal and generates the step up/down data.The receiver preferably has a data signal rate converter which decreasesthe data rate of received transmission data M(t) to produce a user datasignal having a lower data rate N(t), a data quality measuring devicefor measuring the quality of data of the user data signal, and circuitryfor computing step up/down data based in part on the measured quality ofdata of the user data signal. The data signal rate converter isassociated with the circuitry to provide rate data such that thecircuitry computes step up/down data as a function of N(t)/M(t) wherebya change in the user data signal rate or the rate of the transmissiondata signal is compensated for in advance of a quality of data basedadjustment associated with such data rate change.

The system also preferably includes a transmitter having a data signalrate convertor which converts the user data signal having rate N(t) intothe transmission data signal having a faster rate M(t) by repeatingselected data bits whereby the energy per bit to noise spectrum densityratio is increased in the transmission data signal.

In a preferred embodiment, the receiver has an interference measuringdevice for measuring the power of an interference signal received withthe M(t) rate transmission data signal. The data quality measuringdevice outputs a nominal target SIR data based on relatively slowlycollected received data quality data. The receiver circuitry computesthe step up/down data by combining measured interference power data ofthe signal received from the transmitter with target signal tointerference ratio SIR data which is computed by multiplying the nominaltarget SIR data by a factor N(t)/M(t) so that the target SIR data isquickly adjusted when a change in data rate occurs.

Other objects and advantages will be apparent to those of ordinary skillin the art based upon the following description of presently preferredembodiments of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING(S)

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a conventional open loop power controlsystem for single rate data wireless communication.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a conventional closed loop powercontrol system for single rate data wireless communication.

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a conventional open loop power controlsystem for variable multirate data wireless communication.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a conventional closed loop powercontrol system for variable multirate data wireless communication.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of data rate up-conversion from 6 to 8 bitsper block using repetition.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of data rate down-conversion of repeated datafrom 8 to 6 bits per block.

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a fast adaptive open loop power controlsystem for variable multirate data wireless communication made inaccordance with the teaching of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of a fast adaptive closed loop powercontrol system for variable multirate data wireless communication madein accordance with the teaching of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)

Conventional power control methods for wireless systems such as 3G PPutilize so-called inner and outer loops. The power control system isreferred to as either open or closed dependent upon whether the innerloop is open or closed. The outer loops of both types of systems areclosed loops.

Pertinent portions of an open loop power control system having a“transmitting” communication station 10 and a “receiving” communicationstation 30 are shown in FIG. 1. Both stations 10, 30 are transceivers.Typically one is a base station and the other a type of user equipmentUE. For clarity, only selected components are illustrated.

The transmitting station 10 includes a transmitter 11 having a data line12 which transports a user data signal for transmission. The user datasignal is provided with a desired power level which is adjusted byapplying a transmit power scale factor from an output 13 of a processor15 to adjust the transmission power level. The user data is transmittedfrom an antenna system 14 of the transmitter 11.

A wireless radio signal 20 containing the transmitted data is receivedby the receiving station 30 via a receiving antenna system 31. Thereceiving antenna system will also receive interfering radio signals 21which impact on the quality of the received data. The receiving station30 includes an interference power measuring device 32 to which thereceived signal is input which device 32 outputs measured interferencepower data. The receiving station 30 also includes a data qualitymeasuring device 34 into which the received signal is also input whichdevice 34 produces a data quality signal. The data quality measuringdevice 34 is coupled with a processing device 36 which receives thesignal quality data and computes target signal to interference ratio(SIR) data based upon a user defined quality standard parameter receivedthrough an input 37.

The receiving station 30 also includes a transmitter 38 which is coupledwith the interference power measuring device 32 and the target SIRgenerating processor 36. The receiving station's transmitter 38 alsoincludes inputs 40, 41, 42 for user data, a reference signal, andreference signal transmit power data, respectively. The receivingstation 30 transmits its user data and the control related data andreferences signal via an associated antenna system 39.

The transmitting station 10 includes a receiver 16 and an associatedreceiving antenna system 17. The transmitting station's receiver 16receives the radio signal transmitted from the receiving station 30which includes the receiving station's user data 44 and the controlsignal and data 45 generated by the receiving station 30.

The transmitting station processor 15 is associated with thetransmitting station's receiver 16 in order to compute the transmitpower scale factor. The transmitter 11 also includes a device 18 formeasuring received reference signal power which device 18 is associatedwith path loss computing circuitry 19.

In order to compute the transmit power scale factor, the processor 15receives data from a target SIR data input 22 which carries the targetSIR data generated by the receiver station's target SIR generatingprocessor 36, an interference power data input 23 which carries theinterference data generated by the receiving station's interferencepower measuring device 32, and a path loss data input 24 which carries apath loss signal that is the output of the path loss computing circuitry19. The path loss signal is generated by the path loss computingcircuitry 19 from data received via a reference signal transmit powerdata input 25 which carries the reference signal transmit power dataoriginating from the receiving station 30 and a measured referencesignal power input 26 which carries the output of the reference signalpower measuring device 18 of the transmitter 11. The reference signalmeasuring device 18 is coupled with the transmitting station's receiver16 to measure the power of the reference signal as received from thereceiving station's transmitter 38. The path loss computing circuitry 19preferably determines the path loss based upon the difference betweenthe known reference power signal strength conveyed by input 25 and themeasured received power strength conveyed by input 26.

Interference power data, reference signal power data and target SIRvalues are signaled to the transmitting station 10 at a ratesignificantly lower than the time-varying rate of the propagationchannel and interference. The “inner” loop is the portion of the systemwhich relies on the measured interface. The system is considered “openloop” because there is no feedback to the algorithm at a rate comparableto the time-varying rate of the propagation channel and interferenceindicating how good the estimates of minimum required transmitter powerare. If required transmit power level changes rapidly, the system cannotrespond accordingly to adjust the scale factor in a timely manner.

With respect to the outer loop of the open loop power control system ofFIG. 1, at the remote receiver station 30, the quality of the receiveddata is evaluated via the measuring device 34. Typical metrics fordigital data quality are bit error rate and block error rate.Computation of these metrics requires data accumulated over periods oftime significantly longer than the period of the time-varyingpropagation channel and interference. For any given metric, there existsa theoretical relationship between the metric and received SIR. Whenenough data has been accumulated in the remote receiver to evaluate themetric, it is computed and compared with the desired metric(representing a desired quality of service) in processor 36 and anupdated target SIR is then output. The updated target SIR is that value(in theory) which applied in the transmitter inner loop would cause themeasured metric to converge to the desired value. Finally, the updatedtarget SIR is passed, via the receiving station transmitter 38 and thetransmitting station receiver 16, to the transmitter 11 for use in itsinner loop. The update rate of target SIR is bounded by the timerequired to accumulate the quality statistic and practical limits on thesignaling rate to the power-controlled transmitter.

With reference to FIG. 2, a communication system having a transmittingstation 50 and a receiving station 70 which employs a closed loop powercontrol system is illustrated.

The transmitting station 50 includes a transmitter 51 having a data line52 which transports a user data signal for transmission. The user datasignal is provided with a desired power level which is adjusted byapplying a transmit power scale factor from an output 53 of a processor55 to adjust the power level. The user data is transmitted via anantenna system 54 of the transmitter 51.

A wireless radio signal 60 containing the transmitted data is receivedby the receiving station 70 via a receiving antenna system 71. Thereceiving antenna system will also receive interfering radio signals 71which impact on the quality of the received data. The receiving station70 includes an interference power measuring device 72 to which thereceived signal is input which device 72 outputs measured SIR data. Thereceiving station 70 also includes a data quality measuring device 73into which the received signal is also input which device 73 produces adata quality signal. The data quality measuring device 73 is coupledwith a processor 74 which receives the signal quality data and computestarget signal to interference ratio (SIR) data based upon a user definedquality standard parameter received through an input 75.

A combiner 76, preferably a substracter, compares the measured SIR datafrom the device 72 with the computed target SIR data from the processor74, preferably by subtracting, to output an SIR error signal. The SIRerror signal from the combiner 76 is input to processing circuitry 77which generates step up/down commands based thereon.

The receiving station 70 also includes a transmitter 78 which is coupledwith the processing circuitry 77. The receiving station's transmitter 78also includes an input 80 for user data. The receiving station 70transmits its user data and the control related data via an associateantenna system 79.

The transmitting station 50 includes a receiver 56 and an associatedreceiving antenna system 57. The transmitting station's receiver 56receives the radio signal transmitted from the receiving station 70which includes the receiving station's user data 84 and the control data85 generated by the receiving station.

The transmitting station's scale factor processor 55 has an input 58associated with the transmitting station's receiver 56. The processor 55receives the up/down command signal through input 58 and computes thetransmit power scale factor based thereon.

With respect to the inner loop of the closed loop power control system,the transmitting station's transmitter 51 sets its power based uponhigh-rate “step-up” and “step-down” commands generated by the remotereceiving station 70. At the remote receiving station 70, the SIR of thereceived data is measured by the measuring device 72 and compared with atarget SIR value generated by the processor 74 via combiner 76. Thetarget SIR is that value (in theory) which, given that the data isreceived with that value, results in a desired quality of service. Ifthe measured received SIR is less than the target SIR, a “step-down”command is issued by the processing circuitry 77, via the receivingstation's transmitter 78 and the transmitting station's receiver 56, tothe transmitter 51, otherwise a “step-up” command is issued. The powercontrol system is considered “closed-loop” because of the high-ratefeedback of the “step-up” and “step-down” commands which can react inreal time to the time-varying propagation channel and interference. Ifrequired transmit power level changes due to time varying interferenceand propagation, it quickly responds and adjusts transmit poweraccordingly.

With respect to the outer loop of the closed loop power control system,the quality of the received data is evaluated in the receiving station70 by the measuring device 73. Typical metrics for digital data qualityare bit error rate and block error rate. Computation of these metricsrequires data accumulated over periods of time significantly longer thanthe period of the time-varying propagation channel and interference. Forany given metric, there exists a theoretical relationship between themetric and received SIR. When enough data has been accumulated in theremote receiver to evaluate the metric, it is computed and compared withthe desired metric (representing a desired quality of service) by theprocessor 74 and an updated target SIR is then output. The updatedtarget SIR is that value (in theory) which applied in the receiveralgorithm would cause the measured metric to converge to the desiredvalue. The updated target SIR is then used in the inner loop todetermine the direction of the step up/down commands sent to thetransmitting station's power scale generating processor 55 to controlthe power of the transmitter 51.

FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate power control systems for single rate datatransmissions. However, in a digital communications system, data can beprocessed in blocks with a given bit rate and given block size, oralternatively, a given number of bits per block and given block rate. Insuch systems, for example, 3GPP FDD and TDD systems, more than one datarate can exist at any given time within the communications system, andsuch data rates can vary over time. FIG. 3 illustrates a modifiedopen-loop power control system and FIG. 4 illustrates a modifiedclosed-loop power control system for wireless systems which communicatemultiple data channels having variable data rates.

To accommodate multichannel variable rate data transmission, the openloop power control system illustrated in FIG. 1 is modified, as shown inFIG. 3, to include an up converter 27 in the transmitting station 10 anda down converter 47 in the receiving station 30.

The user data for transmission is combined into a signal having a datarate N(t). The data stream having the rate N(t) is converted to a datastream having a higher rate M(t) by data up converter 27 which has anoutput 28 which carries the transmission data signal having the rateM(t).

At the receiving station 30, the user data signal having the rate M(t)is received and down converted by the converter 47 to the original rateN(t). The interference power measuring device 32 measures theinterference of the signal as received with its higher M(t) rate. Thedata quality measuring device 34 is coupled to the user data path downstream the converter 47 and measures the quality of the data after ithas been down converted to the N(t) rate.

To accommodate multichannel variable rate data transmission, the closedloop power control system illustrated in FIG. 2 is modified, as shown inFIG. 4, to include an up converter 67 in the transmitting station 50 anda down converter 87 in the receiving station 70. The user data fortransmission is combined into a signal having a data rate N(t). The datastream having the rate N(t) is converted to a data stream having ahigher rate M(t) by data up converter 67 which has an output 68 whichcarries the transmission data signal having the rate M(t).

At the receiving station 70, the user data signal having the rate M(t)is received and down converted by the converter 87 to the original rateN(t). The interference power measuring device 72 measures theinterference of the signal as received with its higher M(t) rate. Thedata quality measuring device 73 is coupled to the user data stream downstream the converter 87 and measures the quality of the data after ithas been down converted to the N(t) rate.

In both types of multichannel variable rate systems, the user data inputto the transmitter 11, 51 for transmission to the remote receiver 30, 70has the data rate denoted N(t) and the user data output from the remotereceiver is at that same rate. Data rate N(t) can be the composite ofseveral data rates of different data channels which have beenmultiplexed for transmission over a common bearer. That N is a functionof (t) indicates that the rate may vary, that is, be different from timeto time, or from block to block. Reasons for this variation include theaddition and/or deletion of data channels and actual data rate changesin existing channels, as is typical for packet services.

Also in both systems, illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4, in the transmit datapath, the date rate is changed from N(t) to M(t) and change back to N(t)in the remote receiver. Data rate N(t) is the user data rate and thedata rate M(t) is over-the-air data rate, which can be quite independentof each other.

In a 3GPP TDD system, for example, M(t) is the number of bits per 10msec. frame in a given number of time slots and orthogonal variablespreading factor codes at given spreading factors. That M is a functionof (t) indicates that the rate may vary, that is, be different from timeto time, or more specifically, from frame-to-frame. Varying M isequivalent to varying the spreading factors and/or number of physicalchannels used per frame, varying N is equivalent to a data rate changein one or more transport channels. Rate M(t) is equivalent to N_(dataj)bits per 10 msec. frame and N(t) is equivalent to${{PL} \cdot {1/{RM}_{\min}}}{\sum\limits_{{TrCH}_{i}}{{RM}_{i} \cdot N_{i,j}}}$bits per 10 msec. frame, during the time t when TFCj is in effect,where, as defined in 3GPP:

N_(ij) is the number of bits in a radio frame before rate matching onTrCH i with transport format combination j.

RM_(i) is the semi-static rate matching attribute for TrCH i which issignaled from higher layers.

PL is the puncturing limit which value limits the amount of puncturingthat can be applied in order to minimize the number of physical channelsand is signaled from higher layers.

N_(dataj) is the total number of bits that are available for a codedcomposite TrCH in a radio frame with transport format combination j.

TF_(i)(j) is the transport format of TrCH i for the transport formatcombination j.

TB or Transport Block is defined as the basic data unit exchangedbetween L1 and MAC. An equivalent term for Transport Block is “MAC PDU”.

TBS or Transport Block Set is defined as a set of Transport Blocks thatis exchanged between Layer 1 and MAC at the same time instance using thesame Transport Channel.

TrCH or Transport Channel are the channels offered by the physical layerto Layer 2 for data transport between peer Layer 1 entities are denoted.Different types of Transport Channels are defined by how and with whichcharacteristics data is transferred on the physical layer, e.g. whetherusing dedicated or common physical channels.

TF or Transport Format is defined as a format offered by Layer 1 to MACfor the delivery of a Transport Block Set during a Transmission TimeInterval on a Transport Channel. The Transport Format constitutes of twoparts—one dynamic part and one semi-static part.

TFC or Transport Format Combination is defined as the combination ofcurrently valid Transport Formats on all Transport Channels, i.e.containing one Transport Format from each Transport Channel.

TFCS or Transport Format Combination Set is defined as a set ofTransport Format Combinations.

MAC or Medium Access Control is a sub-layer of radio interface Layer 2providing unacknowledged data transfer service on logical channels andaccess to Transport Channels.

PDU or Protocol Data Unit is a unit of data specified in an (N)-protocollayer and consisting of (N)-protocol control information and possibly(N)-user data.

The conversion from rate N(t) to rate M(t) is performed in thetransmitting station 10, 50 in the converter 26, 67 which indicatesup-conversion by the factor M(t)/N(t). The conversion rate from rateM(t) back to rate N(t) is performed in the remote receiving station 30,70 in the converter 47, 87 which indicates down-conversion by the factorN(t)/M(t).

In both systems illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4, rate M(t) is shown to behigher than rate N(t). This is deliberate. An unintended effect of theupward rate conversion, mitigation of which is an object of theinvention, occurs only for case of up-conversion by repetition in thetransmitter, which is described below. This effect does not happen ifN(t)=M(t) and the effect is different if N(t)>M(t) which is not thesubject of this invention.

Up-conversion of a data rate can be implemented by repetition, that is,repeating selected bits in a rate N block until it contains the samenumber of bits as a block at rate M and to perform down-conversion bynumerically combing the received repeated “soft” bits. Up-conversion byrepetition is illustrated in an example shown in FIG. 5, where B_(i) isthe i^(th) “hard” bit, that is ±1, in the input sequence, for thesimplified case of increasing the data rate from six to eight bits perblock. In the example, two bits, 2 and 5, are repeated, changing theblock size from six to eight. In FIG. 6, where b_(i)+n_(j) is a “soft”bit, that is, a digital sample within the receiver of the transmittedbit B_(i) plus noise component n_(j) at time j, the down-conversionprocess, with input consisting of eight “soft” bits is illustrated.Received “soft” bits 2 and 3 are numerically summed to form a scaledversion of the original bits 2 and 3; similarly, received “soft” bits 6and 7 are numerically summed to form a scaled version of the originalbit 5.

The particular repeated bits used in the example represent uniformdistribution of repeated bits, which, in conjunction with aninterleaver, is a particular scheme used in a 3GPP system. However, thechoice of bits to repeat is not germane to the invention.

The above-described method of data rate conversion is a component ofso-called “rate matching” using repetition functions used in the 3GPPTDD and FDD systems. It has the advantage, over the simplistic method ofsending (two, in the example) dummy bits to change the data rate, inthat the energy difference between the original shorter and transmittedlonger block can be exploited to improve signal quality. To illustrate,in the example, received bits 2 and 5 have twice the energy per bitnoise spectrum density ratio (Eb/No) of the other received bits. Thisresults in an overall improvement of bit error and block error rates ofthe received data as compared to what those quality metrics would havebeen had the bits not been repeated and two dummy bits been sentinstead. Of course, eight units of energy were used to transmit dataonly requiring six units of energy. There are as a result the effect ofthe unintended but consequential increased transmission energy and theeffect of improved received data quality. Those effects are addressed bythe present invention.

The open and closed power control systems shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 forvariable multirate data are virtually the same as those shown in FIGS. 1and 2 for single rate data. FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 represent open and closedpower control systems for a 3GPP TDD communication system. However, boththe open and closed loop power control systems are less than optimal inaddressing the effects of rate changes for variable multirate data.

In the open loop system of FIG. 3, with N(t) equal to M(t) in the steadystate and ignoring the variance of a fading channel or any variableinterference, the target SIR will settle at a quiescent point yieldingthe desired data quality. This condition is equivalent to the singlerate example of FIG. 1. In a multiple channel variable rate system,however, at some time, t, N, and/or M changes. As described above, wherethis results in an improvement to the measured data quality metric, moreenergy than is actually required is transmitted. The outer loop, whichoperates at a relatively low rate, will eventually detect the improvedsignal quality and then lower the target SIR for the inner loop toreduce transmitter power to compensate for what it perceives as too-highsignal quality. In the meantime, the transmitter 11 will be using moreenergy than is actually necessary to transmit the data (to have itreceived with the required quality). In the case of an open loop powercontrolled transmit station being a battery powered mobile unit (as canbe the case in a 3GPP system), unnecessary battery power is expended.

The invention as it applies to open loop power control for variablemultirate data is illustrated in FIG. 7 where corresponding elements areidentified with the same reference numbers as in FIG. 3. As shown inFIG. 7, the transmitting station's converter 27 provides an additionalinput 29 to the scale factor generating processor 15. Though input 29,the converter provides a signal equivalent to √{square root over ()}(N(t)/M(t)) to the processor 15 as a factor in calculating thetransmit power scale factor. Accordingly, when the modified scale factoris applied to the transmitted data, it causes the transmit power to beadjusted by the factor of:N(t)/M(t)to immediately compensate for the rate change in N(t) or M(t).

This modified scale factor is applied in the same manner as is theconventional scale factor that sets transmitter power, which is derivedfrom:P _(TS) =SIR _(TARGET) +I _(RS)+α(L−L ₀)+L ₀+CONSTANT VALUE  Equation 1where the additive terms represent multiplicative factors expressed indB. As a practical matter, the additional factor used in generating thescale factor becomes simply another term in the above equation, which inthe above form becomes:P _(TS) =SIR _(TARGET) +I _(RS)+α(L−L ₀)+L ₀+CONSTANTVALUE+N(t)/M(t)  Equation 2

where:

P_(TS) is the transmitting station's transmission power level indecibels.

SIR_(TARGET) is determined in the receiving station.

I_(RS) is the measure of the interference power level at the receivingstation.

L is the path loss estimate in decibels for the most recent time slotfor which the path loss was estimated.

L₀, the long term average of the path loss in decibels, is the runningaverage of the pathloss estimate, L.

CONSTANT VALUE is a correction term. The CONSTANT VALUE corrects fordifferences in the uplink and downlink channels, such as to compensatefor differences in uplink and downlink gain. Additionally, the CONSTANTVALUE may provide correction if the transmit power reference level ofthe receiving station is transmitted, instead of the actual transmitpower.

α is a weighting value which is a measure of the quality of theestimated path loss and is, preferably, based on the number of timeslots between the time slot of the last path loss estimate and the firsttime slot of the communication transmitted by the transmitting station.The value of α is between zero and one. Generally, if the timedifference between the time slots is small, the recent path lossestimate will be fairly accurate and α is set at a value close to one.By contrast, if the time difference is large, the path loss estimate maynot be accurate and the long term average path loss measurement is mostlikely a better estimate for the path loss. Accordingly, a is set at αvalue closer to one. Equations 3 and 4 are equations for determining α.α=1−(D−1)/(D _(max)−1)  Equation 3α=max{1−(D−1)/(D _(max-allowed)−1), 0}  Equation 4where the value, D, is the number of time slots between the time slot ofthe last path loss estimate and the first time slot of the transmittedcommunication which will be referred to as the time slot delay. If thedelay is one time slot, α is one. D_(max) is the maximum possible delay.A typical value for a frame having fifteen time slots is seven. If thedelay is D_(max), α is zero D_(max-allowed) is the maximum allowed timeslot delay for using open loop power control. If the delay exceedsD_(max-allowed), open loop power control is effectively turned off bysetting α=0.

As the data rates N(t) and M(t) change from time-to-time, the inventivesystem of FIG. 7 compensates for the change in required power, asopposed to waiting for a revised target SIR to be determined by theouter loop to compensate for the data rate change. Thus, for open looppower control, the invention virtually eliminates the period of timewhen the transmitted signal is sent with excess power due to a data ratechange.

With respect to the closed loop system of FIG. 4 with N(t) equal to M(t)in the steady state, ignoring the variance of a fading channel or anyvariable interference, the target SIR will settle at a quiescent pointyielding the desired data quality. This is the equivalent of the singlerate system of FIG. 2. With variable multirate, however, at some time t,N and/or M changes. As described above, where this results in animprovement to the measured data quality metric, more energy than isactually required is transmitted. However, the measured SIR does notchange with changes in N and M, because the SIR is measured before thedown-conversion with it concomitant increase in Eb/No (or SIR) perrepeated bit. Since the outer loop operates at a relatively low rate, inthe short term, the power control commands sent back to the transmitterwill no longer be accurate. However, eventually the outer loop willdetect the improved signal quality and compute a lower target SIR forthe inner loop to compensate for what it perceives as too-high signalquality. When that happens, this too-low target SIR will downward biasthe step up/down decisions and thus reduce transmitter power. This inturn will result in below-required signal quality at the receiver.Eventually, the outer loop will respond to the degraded signal qualitywith a higher target SIR, and in the steady state the system willeventually converge to the correct power level. Until then, the receivedsignal will be degraded.

FIG. 8 illustrates the invention as it applies to a closed loop powercontrol system for variable multirate data where corresponding elementshave the same reference numerals as in FIG. 4. In the transmitter 51 ofthe transmitting station 50, the converter 67 provides an additionalinput 69 to the scale factor generating processor 55. The converterprovides a signal equivalent to √{square root over ( )}(N(t)/M(t)) sothat the scale factor output by the processor 55 via output 53 is afunction of N(t)/M(t) as described above in connection with the openloop system of FIG. 7.

In the receiver, the converter 87 outputs a signal equivalent toN(t)/M(t) to a combiner 88, preferably a multiplier. The output of thetarget SIR processor 74 is diverted to the combiner 88. The combiner 88combines the rate change data from the converter 87 and the target SIRdata from the processor 74 and outputs an adjusted target SIR to thecombiner 76.

Through this configuration, the processor 74 effectively outputs anominal target SIR. By applying the factor N(t)/M(t) to the nominaltarget SIR determined from the measured signal quality, a more rapidresponse is made to compensate or adjust for a change received power dueto a data rate change.

As data rates N(t) and M(t) change from time-to-time, the system of FIG.8 rapidly compensates for the change in required power in thetransmitter and the changed expected received signal strength in thereceiver, as opposed to waiting for the outer loop to compensate for thedata rate change. Thus, for closed loop power control system of FIG. 8the period of time when the received signal is received below acceptablequality due to a data rate change is reduced.

Although various components have been identified separately within therespective transmitting and receiving stations, those of ordinary skillin the art will recognize that various elements can be combined. Forexample, combiner 88 of the system of FIG. 8 can be embodied in a singleprocessor with processor 74. Other variations and modificationsconsistent with the invention will be recognized by those of ordinaryskill in the art.

1. A user equipment (UE) having a transmission power control for awireless communication system in which user data is processed as amultirate signal having a rate N(t) where N(t) is a function time, inwhich the user data signal having rate N(t) is converted into atransmission data signal having a faster rate M(t) for transmission andin which the transmission power is adjusted by applying a scale factorin response to step up/down data, comprising: a UE transmitter having: aprocessor which computes a scale factor as a function of N(t)/M(t), adata signal rate convertor which converts user data signals having rateN(t) into transmission data signals having a faster rate M(t) byrepeating selected data bits whereby the energy per bit to noisespectrum density ratio is increased in transmission data signals whichit transmits, and a combiner which combines the computed scale factorwith the transmission data signals for transmission by the UE.
 2. The UEof claim 1 wherein the transmitter processor computes the scale factorbased on up/down data received from a station to which the UE istransmitting and √{square root over ( )}(N(t)/M(t)).
 3. A method ofcontrolling UE transmitter power in a wireless communication system inwhich user data is processed as a multirate signal having a rate N(t)where N(t) is a function of time, in which the user data signal havingrate N(t) is converted into a transmission data signal having a fasterrate M(t) for transmission and in which transmitter power is controlledby applying a scale factor comprising: converting user data signalshaving rate N(t) into transmission data signals having a faster rateM(t) by repeating selected data bits whereby the energy per bit to noisespectrum density ratio is increased in transmission data signals whichit transmits; computing the scale factor as a function of N(t)/M(t); andcombining the computed scale factor with the transmission data signalsfor transmission by the UE.
 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the scalefactor is computed based on up/down data received from a station towhich the UE is transmitting and √{square root over ( )}(N(t)/M(t)). 5.A base station having a transmission power control for a wirelesscommunication system in which user data is processed as a multiratesignal having a rate N(t) where N(t) is a function time, in which theuser data signal having rate N(t) is converted into a transmission datasignal having a faster rate M(t) for transmission and in which thetransmission power is adjusted by applying a scale factor in response tostep up/down data, comprising: a base station transmitter having: aprocessor which computes a scale factor as a function of N(t)/M(t), adata signal rate convertor which converts user data signals having rateN(t) into transmission data signals having a faster rate M(t) byrepeating selected data bits whereby the energy per bit to noisespectrum density ratio is increased in transmission data signals whichit transmits, and a combiner which combines the computed scale factorwith the transmission data signals for transmission by the base station.6. The base station of claim 4 wherein the transmitter processorcomputes the scale factor based on up/down data received from a stationto which the base station is transmitting and √{square root over ()}(N(t)/M(t)).
 7. A method of controlling base station transmitter powerin a wireless communication system in which user data is processed as amultirate signal having a rate N(t) where N(t) is a function of time, inwhich the user data signal having rate N(t) is converted into atransmission data signal having a faster rate M(t) for transmission andin which transmitter power is controlled by applying a scale factorcomprising: converting user data signals having rate N(t) intotransmission data signals having a faster rate M(t) by repeatingselected data bits whereby the energy per bit to noise spectrum densityratio is increased in transmission data signals which it transmits;computing the scale factor as a function of N(t)/M(t); and combining thecomputed scale factor with the transmission data signals fortransmission by the base station.
 8. The method of claim 7 wherein thescale factor is computed based on up/down data received from a stationto which the base station is transmitting and √{square root over ()}(N(t)/M(t)).